home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
- Path: new-news.sprintlink.net!eskimo!scs
- From: scs@eskimo.com (Steve Summit)
- Subject: Re: 16bit vs. 32bit
- X-Nntp-Posting-Host: eskimo.com
- Message-ID: <DovvHG.3DK@eskimo.com>
- Sender: news@eskimo.com (News User Id)
- Organization: schmorganization
- References: <4iui27$egk@news.netam.net>
- Date: Tue, 26 Mar 1996 16:36:51 GMT
-
- In article <4iui27$egk@news.netam.net>, bgc@alpha.netam.net writes:
- > Could someone explain, technically, what 16bit and 32bit refers to?
-
- What these "terms" mean, if you find yourself needing to know
- them, is that:
-
- 1. The program you're working with was poorly designed, or
- 2. The compiler you're using was poorly designed, or
- 3. The operating system you're using was poorly designed, or
- 4. The processor you're using was poorly designed, or
- 5. Some or all of the above.
-
- One of the whole points of using a high-level language is to
- insulate you from low-level machine implementation details such
- as the sizes of things in bits. If you find yourself needing to
- know the sizes of things in bits, someone screwed up.
-
- (There is, of course, some debate over whether C truly is a
- high-level language. People used to tease (or praise) it as
- being nothing more than a high-level assembler for the PDP-11.
- In many circles, it seems that it's now being used as a
- high-level assembler for the Intel 80*86.)
-
- Steve Summit
- scs@eskimo.com
- --
- The Communications Decency Act within the Telecommunications Act
- of 1996 (U.S.) is an annoying, threatening, abusive, indecent,
- and obscene piece of legislation which attempts to ban annoying,
- threatening, abusive, indecent, or obscene communication.
-